Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography in evaluation of undetermined etiology of bile ducts dilation in imaging

Samir Mrabti, Hassan Seddik, Hanae Boutallaka, Khaoula Loubaris, Tarik Adajou, Asmae Sair, Ahlame Benhamdane, Reda Berraida, Sara Sentissi, Ilham El koti, Ahmed Benkirane

Abstract


Aim:

The aim is to determine the role of endoscopic ultrasonography in assessment of etiological diagnosis of bile ducts dilation when conventional imaging is inconclusive.

Background

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is an effective and primordial procedure in exploration of abnormalities of biliopancreatic junction. However, its results depend of the operator expertise, and its availability is currently insufficient in our regions.

Methods:

This is a retrospective descriptive study conducted from January 2008to May2019, including 42 patients with intra-and/or extra-hepatic bile duct dilatation without visible obstacle on imaging. TODANI classification was considered for common bile duct (CBD) cystic dilations. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS software version24.0.

Results:

We enrolled 42patients responding to inclusion criteria in the study, which represented 10.18% of all indications of EUS. The mean age of our patients was 59.05±13.11 years, with a female predominance. Endoscopic findings showed a normal papilla in 92, 9%. EUS showed a dilated CBD in 66.8% of cases, she has allowed to make the diagnosis of a cystic dilation of CBD in 52,4%, predominated by type Ia and Ib in 45,2% and 4.8% respectively, of ampulloma in 4.8% (n = 2), papillomatosis of the bile ducts in 2.4% (n = 1), one case of pancreatic head tumor (2,4%), and choledocholithiasis in 4.8% (n = 2). By against EUS showed no expansion in 33.3% (n = 14).

Conclusion:

Our study confirms the prominent place of EUS in etiological profile of bile ducts dilatations when imaging is inconclusive.


Keywords


common bile duct diseases; endosonography; bile ducts

References


: Holm AN, Gerke H. What should be done with a dilated bile duct? Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2010; 12: 150-156. DOI:10.1007/s11894-010-0094-3

: Niederau C, Sonnenberg A, Mueller J. Comparison of the extrahepatic bile duct size measured by ultrasound and by different radiographic methods. Gastroenterology 1984; 87:615-621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(84)90534-1

: Kaim A, Steinke K, Frank M, et al. Diameter of the common bile duct in the elderly patient: measurement by ultrasound. Eur Radiol 1998; 8:1413-1415. DOI: 10.1007/s003300050563

: Songur Y, Temucin G, Sahin B. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of dilated common bile duct. J Clin Gastroenterol 2001;33:302-305. PMID: 11588544

: Ledro-Cano D. Suspected choledocholithiasis: endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography A systematic review. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;19:1007–1011. DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328133f30b

: Laing FC, Jeffrey RB, Wing VW, Nyberg DA. Biliary dilatation: defining the level and cause by real-time US. Radiology. 1986;160:39–42. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.160.1.3012631

: Baron RL. Common bile duct stones: reassessment of criteria for CT diagnosis. Radiology. 1987; 162: 419-424. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.162.2.3797655

: Palazzo L, Girollet PP, Salmeron M, Silvain C, Roseau G, Canard JM, et al. Value of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: comparison with surgical exploration and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;42:225–231. PMID: 7498687

: Kondo S, Isayama H, Akahane M, Toda N, Sasahira N, Nakai Y, et al. Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and helical-computed-tomographic cholangiography. Eur J Radiol. 2005; 54:271–275. DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.07.007

: Gan SI, Rajan E, Adler DG, Baron TH, Anderson MA, Cash BD et al. Role of EUS. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:425–434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.05.026

: Buscarini E, Tansini P, Vallisa D, Zambelli A, Buscarini L. EUS for suspected choledocholithiasis: do benefits outweigh costs A prospective, controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:510–518. DOI: 10.1067/mge.2003.149

: Kohut M, Nowakowska-Duława E, Marek T, Kaczor R, Nowak A. Accuracy of linear endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of patients with suspected common bile duct stones. Endoscopy. 2002;34:299–303. DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-23641

: Fernández-Esparrach G, Ginès A, Sánchez M, Pagés M, Pellisé M, Fernández-Cruz L, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary diseases: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:1632–1639. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01333.x

: Tse F, Liu L, Barkun AN, Armstrong D, Moayyedi P. EUS: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:235–244. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.09.047

: Visser BC, Suh I, Way LW, Kang SM. Congenital choledochal cysts in adults. Arch Surg. 2004;139:855–860; discussion 860-862. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.139.8.855

: Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM, Lam CM, Poon RT, Wong J. Choledochal cysts in adults. Arch Surg. 2002;137:465–468. PMID: 11926955

: Early DS, Acosta RD, Chandrasekhara V, Chathadi KV, Decker GA, Evans JA, et al. Adverse events associated with EUS and EUS with FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:839–843. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.02.018

: Amouyal P, Palazzo L, Amouyal G, Ponsot P, Mompoint D, Vilgrain V, et al. Endosonography: promising method for diagnosis of extrahepatic cholestasis. Lancet. 1989;2:1195–1198. PMID: 2572911

: de Lédinghen V, Lecesne R, Raymond JM, Gense V, Amouretti M, Drouillard J, et al. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography. A prospective controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:26–31. PMID: 9869719

: Scheiman JM, Carlos RC, Barnett JL, Elta GH, Nostrant TT, Chey WD, et al. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease A prospective trial and cost analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:2900–2904. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.04245.x

: Anderson MA, Fisher L, Jain R, Evans JA, Appalaneni V, Ben-Menachem T, et al. Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75:467–473. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.010

: Mercadier M, Chigot JP, Clot JP, Langlois P, Lansinaux P. Caroli disease. World J Surg 1984; 8 :22-9. PMID: 6367232

: Kianmanesh R, Régimbeau JM , Belghiti J. Anomalies de la jonction biliopancréatique et dilatations kystiques congénitales des voies biliaires.J Chir (Paris) 2001, 138-4 : 196-204

: Olbourne NA. Choledochal cyst : a review of the cystic anomalous of the biliary tree. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1975, 56: 26-32. PMID: 1096740

: Nagata E, Sakai K, kinoshita H, Hirohashi K. Choledochal cyst: complications of anomalous of the biliary tract. World J Surg 1986,10: 102-10. PMID: 3962321

: Lacheretz M, Debeugry YP, Bonnevalle M. Etiologie de la dilatation congénitale du choledoque chez l’enfant.Chirurgie 1986,114: 111-4

: Desmet VJ. Congenital disease of intra hepatic bile duct: variation on the terme °ductal plate malformation°. Hepatology 1992, 16: 1069-83. PMID: 1398487

: Babbit DP. Congenital choledochal cyst: new etiological concepts based on anomalous relationship of the common bile duct and pancreatic bulb. Ann Radiol 1969,12:231-40. PMID:5401505

: The Japanese study group on pancreatico biliary maljunction. Diagnostic criteria of pancreatico biliary maljunction. J Hepatobiliary Pancreatol Surg 1994,1:219-21

: Iwai N, Tokiwa K, Yanagihara J, Takahashi T. Biliary manometry in choledochal cyst with abnormal choledocho pancreatico ductal junction. J Ped Surg 1986,21: 873-6. PMID: 2431131

: Tsukada K, Takada T, Miyazaki M, et al. Japanese Association of Biliary Surgery; Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery; Japan Society of Clinical Oncology. Diagnosis of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg2008;15:31-40. Doi: 10.1007/s00534-007-1278-6

: Crone-Münzebrock W, Rowedder A, Meyer-Pannwitt U, et al. Comparative efficacy of sonography, computed tomography, ERCP and angiography in the diagnosis of primary papillary carcinomas. Rontgenblatter 1990;43:266-9. PMID: 2196668

: Moreira VF, Meroño E, del Olmo L, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of carcinomas of Vater's ampulla (ampulloma). Rev Esp Enferm Apar Dig 1985;67:524-9

: Albores-Saavedra J, Scoazec JY, Wittekind C, Sripa B, Menck HR, Soehendra N. et al. in Hamil ton SR, Aaltonen LA. World Health Organization Classification of Tumors. Pathology and Genetics Of tumors of the Digestive System. Lyon: IARC Press, 2000.

: Lee SS, Kim MH, Lee SK, Jang SJ, Song MH, Kim KP, et al. Clinicopathologic review of 58 patients with biliary papillomatosis. Cancer 2004,100:783-93. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20031

: S. Mannai et al./ Annales de chirurgie 131 (2006) 369-374. doi.org/10.1016/j.anchir.2006.03.008


Full Text: PDF HTML

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.